Home Breadcrumb caret Industry News Breadcrumb caret Industry Morningstar unveils competing fund categories Morningstar Canada has released the first draft of proposed new categories for mutual funds, just days before the Canadian Investment Funds Standard Committee prepares to overhaul its system. Morningstar left the CIFSC in March, saying the committee was moving too slowly on fundamental questions such as breaking down major fund categories into subsets. CIFSC’s revised […] By Mark Brown | May 26, 2006 | Last updated on May 26, 2006 4 min read Morningstar Canada has released the first draft of proposed new categories for mutual funds, just days before the Canadian Investment Funds Standard Committee prepares to overhaul its system. Morningstar left the CIFSC in March, saying the committee was moving too slowly on fundamental questions such as breaking down major fund categories into subsets. CIFSC’s revised fund categories are expected to be announced on Wednesday and will come into effect this July. CIFSC has been talking about a total revision of its classification scheme since October and has been formally circulating its proposed categories around the industry since February. Since Morningstar was a member of CIFSC during much of this period, it is possible that several of Morningstar’s ideas may parallel the new standard. Morningstar presented several of its ideas just before it resigned from the CIFSC. “There were a lot of interesting ideas there,” says CIFSC chair Ralf Hensel, but he adds that some of Morningstar’s suggestions were reliant on a proprietary methodology that other data providers on the board couldn’t match. Morningstar’s new approach would introduce 46 fund categories, not counting 15 proposed hedge fund groupings. The new categories are described in great detail in a discussion paper released on Friday. The hedge fund categories were designed by Morningstar’s head office in the U.S. and added to the Canadian mix, since there is quite a bit of overlap, explains David O’Leary, the senior analyst charged with developing the new categorization system for Morningstar Canada. All told, Morningstar’s new approach has 29 more categories than the current 34 set by the CIFSC. Most of the new categories are the result of breaking up some of the large CIFSC categories like the Canadian Balanced fund group into more specific elements. (A complete list of the new categories can be found on the next page). For instance, under the current structure the Canadian Balanced category tracks some 950 funds. Morningstar suggest breaking this down into four groups: tactical asset allocations, an equity tilt, a fixed income tilt and a neutral that is an even split between fixed-income and equities. “Most of the additions come in really big categories,” says O’Leary. The changes are designed to eliminate the problem of funds being slotted into the wrong group. Several funds in the Global Balanced category invest basically only in stocks, O’Leary notes, citing RBC-DS Aggressive Growth as an example. “The fund only came out in September 2005 but has never had any exposure to bonds,” he says. “Why isn’t it in the equity category?” Funds are also currently misclassified by geographic region, he adds. Consider Investors’ Tactical Asset Allocation fund which currently sits in the Global Balanced & Asset Allocation category. In the 12 year history of this fund, the most it has ever held in non-Canadian stocks and bonds is less than 2%. “In the past few years this would be an unfair advantage for the fund since the Canadian markets have dramatically outperformed other world markets,” O’Leary explains. But will having another set of fund groupings create confusion in the industry? O’Leary doesn’t think so. “I think the fear of having a multiple categorization system is overblown,” he says. Fund companies fear that the new structure might cause some confusion, but as O’Leary points out, that’s nothing new. IFIC only recently started using CIFSC categories when reporting funds sales and Globefund’s star rating uses its own categories for its star rating system. “The CIFSC is probably the most widely accepted, but there still are multiple categorization standards out there.” “We agree on the theory,” says Hensel. “I still disagree that it was necessary to have a separate system.” His concern is that this could push Canada towards the U.S. model of comparing funds. As Hensel points out, the United States has three main data providers but there is no standardization of how that data is reported. What ends up happening, he says, is that fund companies choose whichever one makes them look best. Morningstar is giving industry participants until June 23 to provide feedback on its new categories and plans to roll out the final version later this year. Asset Class Morningstar Canada Category Name Money Market Canadian Money Market US Money Market Canadian Fixed Income Short Duration Income Core Income Long Duration Income Inflation-Protected Global Fixed Income Global High Yield Fixed Income High Yield Portfolio Income Income Portfolio Canadian Portfolio Canadian Tactical Asset Allocation Canadian Equity Tilt Canadian Neutral Canadian Fixed Income Tilt Global Portfolio Global Tactical Asset Allocation Global Equity Tilt Global Neutral Global Fixed Income Tilt Life Cycle Portfolio 5 Year Target Date 10 Year Target Date 15 Year Target Date 15+ Year Target Date Equity Income Equity Income Equity High Income Domestic Equity Canadian Large Cap Canadian Small/Mid Cap Canadian Anchored Large Cap Canadian Anchored Small/Mid Cap Foreign Equity North America US Large Cap US Small/Mid Cap Asia Pacific Rim Asia Pacific Rim ex-Japan Japan Europe Emerging Markets Global Large Cap Global Small/Mid Cap International Sector Equity Financial Services Natural Resources Precious Metals Science & Technology Real Estate Healthcare Specialty Labour Sponsored Investment Fund Specialty Hedge Fund Equity Focus Equity Net Long Equity Focus Equity Net Neutral Equity Focus Equity Net Short Equity Focus Equity Variable Arbitrage Relative Value Arbitrage Arbitrage Convertible Arbitrage Arbitrage Fixed Income Arbitrage Corporate Life Cycle Corporate Event Driven Corporate Life Cycle Distressed Companies Corporate Life Cycle Merger Arbitrage Macroeconomic Trends Global Macro Macroeconomic Trends Emerging Markets Macroeconomic Trends Managed Futures Combinations Multi Strategy Combinations Fund of Funds Filed by Mark Brown, Advisor.ca, mark.brown@advisor.rogers.com (05/26/06) Mark Brown Save Stroke 1 Print Group 8 Share LI logo