Deliver value or get out, study warns

By Kate McCaffery | April 21, 2006 | Last updated on April 21, 2006
4 min read
  • Strategic and selective partnerships to fully exploit a firm’s capabilities will be key. “Successful firms will partner to service their clients as specialists, with some choosing to divest parts of their firms as part of a “capability sway.” Across the industry respondents recognized the potential for growth strategies to be complimentary rather than strictly competitive.”
  • Firms will focus more on optimizing the profitability of each client and gaining the capability to mine profits. Only one firm surveyed said they had the ability to measure client profitability across product lines and geographies.
  • Regardless of their specific industry roles, executives say they recognized the need to build strong client relationships and create differentiated products.
  • Scale comes with size. “One of the assumptions underlying the attractiveness of the universal banks’ business model is that efficiency automatically comes with scale. In reality, however, firms often end up squandering potential scale benefits. Firms will need to leverage scale while avoiding its traps (for example, internal silos or excessive bureaucracy).”

    This struggle for position at the institutional level will likely trickle down to financial planning. Along with added pressure and focus on client profitability, buy side investors, also known as institutional and retail asset managers, say they expect their greatest growth opportunities to come from private equity and service to ultra wealthy investors.

    In an effort to provide trusted advice, buy side distribution strategies are expected to shift away from retail brokers and managers towards independent financial advisors and service from universal banks, and more firms will reconsider housing their asset management or manufacturing and distribution or advice activities in the same firm.

    While buy side institutional investors eyeball this market, sell side firms, those traditionally involved in institutional sales and trading, will start finding their growth opportunities in riskier activities and will begin to compete with buy side firms for pension clients.

    This focus on profits and the erosion of agency profits, thanks to the forces of transparency and speed, will be the drivers of industry change in the next ten years, the report says. “The rapid growth and outsized returns that have characterized the history of the sector are showing signs of strain,” say the report’s authors. “The cumulative effects of transparency and speed will be far-reaching. As the industry continues to mature and returns normalize, firms will need to find new ways to create value.”

    Filed by Kate McCaffery, Advisor.ca, kate.mccaffery@advisor.rogers.com

    (04/21/06)<

    Kate McCaffery

  • Firms need to determine their optimal long term risk relationship in planning future growth strategies to determine if the firm will be one focused on assuming risk, by creating structured products for example, or mitigating risk.
  • Strategic and selective partnerships to fully exploit a firm’s capabilities will be key. “Successful firms will partner to service their clients as specialists, with some choosing to divest parts of their firms as part of a “capability sway.” Across the industry respondents recognized the potential for growth strategies to be complimentary rather than strictly competitive.”
  • Firms will focus more on optimizing the profitability of each client and gaining the capability to mine profits. Only one firm surveyed said they had the ability to measure client profitability across product lines and geographies.
  • Regardless of their specific industry roles, executives say they recognized the need to build strong client relationships and create differentiated products.
  • Scale comes with size. “One of the assumptions underlying the attractiveness of the universal banks’ business model is that efficiency automatically comes with scale. In reality, however, firms often end up squandering potential scale benefits. Firms will need to leverage scale while avoiding its traps (for example, internal silos or excessive bureaucracy).”

    This struggle for position at the institutional level will likely trickle down to financial planning. Along with added pressure and focus on client profitability, buy side investors, also known as institutional and retail asset managers, say they expect their greatest growth opportunities to come from private equity and service to ultra wealthy investors.

    In an effort to provide trusted advice, buy side distribution strategies are expected to shift away from retail brokers and managers towards independent financial advisors and service from universal banks, and more firms will reconsider housing their asset management or manufacturing and distribution or advice activities in the same firm.

    While buy side institutional investors eyeball this market, sell side firms, those traditionally involved in institutional sales and trading, will start finding their growth opportunities in riskier activities and will begin to compete with buy side firms for pension clients.

    This focus on profits and the erosion of agency profits, thanks to the forces of transparency and speed, will be the drivers of industry change in the next ten years, the report says. “The rapid growth and outsized returns that have characterized the history of the sector are showing signs of strain,” say the report’s authors. “The cumulative effects of transparency and speed will be far-reaching. As the industry continues to mature and returns normalize, firms will need to find new ways to create value.”

    Filed by Kate McCaffery, Advisor.ca, kate.mccaffery@advisor.rogers.com

    (04/21/06)<