FAIR Canada applauds Saskatchewan’s OBSI bill
"Landmark" legislation is significant step forward in protecting investors, organization says
By James Langton |May 28, 2024
2 min read
Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced a new Registered Disability Savings Plan, a plan modelled after an RESP that allows anyone — family members and non-relatives alike — to contribute a maximum of $200,000 into a RDSP, with no annual limit. The beneficiary will cash out when he or she turn 60.
“This is something we should all welcome,” says Janet Freedman, president of Toronto-based Finance Matters. Freedman, who has many clients with disabled children, has been following the development of an RDSP for some time. While the new initiative won’t help young families, she says, when parents reach old age, having funds to help their disabled child is crucial.
“This adds peace of mind,” she says. “We have a generation of parents who have taken care of kids with pretty severe disabilities at home. There’s going to be an enormous problem when they can’t take care of those kids.”
Harry Perler, CEO of Perler Financial in Coquitlam, B.C., also welcomes an RDSP. “We have a fellow in our office that has a whole pile of clients that is going to help,” he says.
But not all advisors are thrilled with the new proposal. Laurie Stephenson, a CFP at Halifax-based Stephenson Daigle Financial, says the plan will help affluent clients more than middle-income earners.
“What I notice with our clients that have children with disabilities is that a lot of the time one income earner is at home, even with my more affluent clients. In terms of time, energy and resources that that can take up, people lose out on income.”
Though Stephenson says the RDSP has “real potential,” she says the government should have considered investing more into disability programs.
While many advisors are pleased that the budget addresses families with disabled children, overall they’re not thrilled with Flaherty’s announcement.
“I was expecting more,” says Stephenson. “I don’t think it lived up to the hype and I don’t think our clients will think so either. It might buy a family a laptop.”
She says several tax savings, such as the child credit tax of $2,000, which would save up to $310 per child, and the phasing out of the marriage penalty, arn’tenough to help the middle-class family. “If (our clients save) $800, I’m sure that even for the average Canadian family that’s not that big a boost.”
Charlie Tinling, a CFP with Winnipeg’s Tinling Financial, isn’t impressed either. He says the budget addresses single-income families, but not double earners. “There wasn’t much said in there. With both people working it means nothing to them.”
His biggest concern is the lack of tax cuts for the middle class. “It’s the middle class that supports the country with taxes and they haven’t given anything back to these people.”
While some advisors lament the lack of big savings, Mews takes a different perspective. She says any savings is good savings, even if it’s only $310. “That’s an extra amount you can put towards a child’s education. As a financial advisor that’s what we like to tell people. Any amount that you save will make a difference long-term.”
Filed by Bryan Borzykowski (Bryan.Borzykowski@advisor.rogers.com) and Mark Noble ( Mark.Noble@advisor.rogers.com), Advisor.ca
(03/19/07)
Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced a new Registered Disability Savings Plan, a plan modelled after an RESP that allows anyone — family members and non-relatives alike — to contribute a maximum of $200,000 into a RDSP, with no annual limit. The beneficiary will cash out when he or she turn 60.
“This is something we should all welcome,” says Janet Freedman, president of Toronto-based Finance Matters. Freedman, who has many clients with disabled children, has been following the development of an RDSP for some time. While the new initiative won’t help young families, she says, when parents reach old age, having funds to help their disabled child is crucial.
“This adds peace of mind,” she says. “We have a generation of parents who have taken care of kids with pretty severe disabilities at home. There’s going to be an enormous problem when they can’t take care of those kids.”
Harry Perler, CEO of Perler Financial in Coquitlam, B.C., also welcomes an RDSP. “We have a fellow in our office that has a whole pile of clients that is going to help,” he says.
But not all advisors are thrilled with the new proposal. Laurie Stephenson, a CFP at Halifax-based Stephenson Daigle Financial, says the plan will help affluent clients more than middle-income earners.
“What I notice with our clients that have children with disabilities is that a lot of the time one income earner is at home, even with my more affluent clients. In terms of time, energy and resources that that can take up, people lose out on income.”
Though Stephenson says the RDSP has “real potential,” she says the government should have considered investing more into disability programs.
While many advisors are pleased that the budget addresses families with disabled children, overall they’re not thrilled with Flaherty’s announcement.
“I was expecting more,” says Stephenson. “I don’t think it lived up to the hype and I don’t think our clients will think so either. It might buy a family a laptop.”
She says several tax savings, such as the child credit tax of $2,000, which would save up to $310 per child, and the phasing out of the marriage penalty, arn’tenough to help the middle-class family. “If (our clients save) $800, I’m sure that even for the average Canadian family that’s not that big a boost.”
Charlie Tinling, a CFP with Winnipeg’s Tinling Financial, isn’t impressed either. He says the budget addresses single-income families, but not double earners. “There wasn’t much said in there. With both people working it means nothing to them.”
His biggest concern is the lack of tax cuts for the middle class. “It’s the middle class that supports the country with taxes and they haven’t given anything back to these people.”
While some advisors lament the lack of big savings, Mews takes a different perspective. She says any savings is good savings, even if it’s only $310. “That’s an extra amount you can put towards a child’s education. As a financial advisor that’s what we like to tell people. Any amount that you save will make a difference long-term.”
Filed by Bryan Borzykowski (Bryan.Borzykowski@advisor.rogers.com) and Mark Noble ( Mark.Noble@advisor.rogers.com), Advisor.ca
(03/19/07)