Advisors urged to follow disclosure recommendations

By Doug Watt | June 20, 2006 | Last updated on June 20, 2006
2 min read
  • A list of companies the intermediary represents
  • How the intermediary is compensated
  • Eligibility for additional compensation
  • Conflict of interest statement
  • Consumers’ right for additional information

    “The template is intended to be a response to the regulators that we make appropriate disclosure to our clients,” Geller explained. “I see this as a marketing tool and a way of building credibility. It’s also a way to protect yourself against possible future liability. And quite frankly, it’s something our clients deserve.”

    Although the document is voluntary, the industry is encouraging all intermediaries to provide disclosure along the lines recommended, Gelgor added.

    And if advisors don’t cooperate, the regulators could step in if problems arise, Geller warned. Their response could include prescriptive rules, instead of the principles-based approach the industry favours and, complicating matters further, each provincial regulator would determine its own rules.

    In other words the regulators are saying, “You do it or we’ll tell you what to do and that is where we are,” Geller said. “Legislation and regulation is still an option.”

    Filed by Doug Watt, Advisor.ca, doug.watt@advisor.rogers.com

    (06/20/06)

    Doug Watt

    • A list of companies the intermediary represents
    • How the intermediary is compensated
    • Eligibility for additional compensation
    • Conflict of interest statement
    • Consumers’ right for additional information

    “The template is intended to be a response to the regulators that we make appropriate disclosure to our clients,” Geller explained. “I see this as a marketing tool and a way of building credibility. It’s also a way to protect yourself against possible future liability. And quite frankly, it’s something our clients deserve.”

    Although the document is voluntary, the industry is encouraging all intermediaries to provide disclosure along the lines recommended, Gelgor added.

    And if advisors don’t cooperate, the regulators could step in if problems arise, Geller warned. Their response could include prescriptive rules, instead of the principles-based approach the industry favours and, complicating matters further, each provincial regulator would determine its own rules.

    In other words the regulators are saying, “You do it or we’ll tell you what to do and that is where we are,” Geller said. “Legislation and regulation is still an option.”

    Filed by Doug Watt, Advisor.ca, doug.watt@advisor.rogers.com

    (06/20/06)