Advisor Forum update: Paper trail, know-your-client keys to winning in court

By Steven Lamb | November 20, 2003 | Last updated on November 20, 2003
4 min read
  • Current: out-of-date client information clouds your understanding of their goals
  • Correct: even the slightest error can call your reliability into question
  • Complete: make sure you have a full understanding
  • Consistent: make sure there are no discrepancies between the notes for separate meetings
  • Contemporaneous: put everything in context to make the image of the meeting more vivid.

    Related News Stories

  • The write stuff: How to protect yourself with a proper paper trail
  • “The version of events that you get from a client will be different from the version of events that you get from the advisor,” she says. “If you have notes that support what you say, then you’re going to be believed.”

    Make sure all trades made are backed up by a documented request. Bessner recommends avoiding discretionary trading in clients’ accounts, since this “favour” is likely to get the advisor in trouble at some point down the road.

    Bessner says it may be necessary to identify potential “rogue clients” and confront the problem before it develops, even if they might be one of the bigger clients in your book.

    “Stop hoping and start thinking,” she says. “And use your professional judgment.”

    • • •

    Advisor.ca can also help you put proper systems and paper trails in place to protect your clients and yourself. For a guide examining the importance of written engagement and disclosure and a customizable “starting-point” template to help you produce your own engagement and disclosure document, please click here. For our customizable investment policy statement (IPS), please click here.

    • • •

    For details on the last Advisor Forum of 2003 in Halifax, please visit the Advisor Forum Web site by clicking here.

    Filed by Steven Lamb, Advisor.ca, slamb@advisor.ca

    (11/20/03)

    Steven Lamb

    • Current: out-of-date client information clouds your understanding of their goals
    • Correct: even the slightest error can call your reliability into question
    • Complete: make sure you have a full understanding
    • Consistent: make sure there are no discrepancies between the notes for separate meetings
    • Contemporaneous: put everything in context to make the image of the meeting more vivid.

    Related News Stories

  • The write stuff: How to protect yourself with a proper paper trail
  • “The version of events that you get from a client will be different from the version of events that you get from the advisor,” she says. “If you have notes that support what you say, then you’re going to be believed.”

    Make sure all trades made are backed up by a documented request. Bessner recommends avoiding discretionary trading in clients’ accounts, since this “favour” is likely to get the advisor in trouble at some point down the road.

    Bessner says it may be necessary to identify potential “rogue clients” and confront the problem before it develops, even if they might be one of the bigger clients in your book.

    “Stop hoping and start thinking,” she says. “And use your professional judgment.”

    • • •

    Advisor.ca can also help you put proper systems and paper trails in place to protect your clients and yourself. For a guide examining the importance of written engagement and disclosure and a customizable “starting-point” template to help you produce your own engagement and disclosure document, please click here. For our customizable investment policy statement (IPS), please click here.

    • • •

    For details on the last Advisor Forum of 2003 in Halifax, please visit the Advisor Forum Web site by clicking here.

    Filed by Steven Lamb, Advisor.ca, slamb@advisor.ca

    (11/20/03)